Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Happy Fish
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Super Serge
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Guardians of Ice & Fire
PG Soft
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.70%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Happy Fish vs Super Serge
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Booongo and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Happy Fish does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Happy Fish does not publish a rating.
Happy Fish vs Guardians of Ice & Fire
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Booongo and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Happy Fish does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Happy Fish does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
