Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
All For One
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 94.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 8,566×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Rabbit Hole Riches - Court of Hearts
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.27%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 8,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 94.00% against 96.27% — Rabbit Hole Riches - Court of Hearts is 2.27 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 8,566× and 8,500×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Rabbit Hole Riches - Court of Hearts returns more in theory over the long run, while All For One reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
