Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Arcane Elements
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 608×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Wicked Witch
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,329×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Arcane: Reel Chaos
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.81%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 774×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Arcane Elements vs Wicked Witch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.2×: 608× against 1,329×, with Wicked Witch higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Arcane Elements vs Arcane: Reel Chaos
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.81% — Arcane: Reel Chaos is 10.81 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 608× against 774×, with Arcane: Reel Chaos higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Arcane: Reel Chaos does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
