Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Atomic Kittens
Habanero
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 17,040×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
VS
Calaveras Explosivas
Habanero
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 21,744×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Golden Pig
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Atomic Kittens vs Calaveras Explosivas
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 17,040× against 21,744×, with Calaveras Explosivas higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Atomic Kittens vs Golden Pig
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Golden Pig does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 6.8×: 17,040× against 2,500×, with Atomic Kittens higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Shared theme signals: Animals, Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
