Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Baba Yaga
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 9,696×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Jingle Bells Bonanza
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,186×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
CULT.
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Baba Yaga vs Jingle Bells Bonanza
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Jingle Bells Bonanza does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 9,696× against 4,186×, with Baba Yaga higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jingle Bells Bonanza does not publish a rating.
Baba Yaga vs CULT.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.51% — CULT. is 10.51 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 9,696× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
