Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Bird of Thunder
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 696×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Fenghuang
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 560×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 696× against 560×, with Bird of Thunder higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fenghuang returns more in theory over the long run, while Bird of Thunder reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
