Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Bird of Thunder
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 696×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
The Wolf's Bane™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.74%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.74% — The Wolf's Bane™ is 10.74 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 696× against 500×, with Bird of Thunder higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: The Wolf's Bane™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. The Wolf's Bane™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Bird of Thunder reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
