Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Buggy Bonus
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Zeus 2
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
VS
Leprechaun goes Egypt
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Buggy Bonus vs Zeus 2
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 92.00% against 92.00%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 500× and 500×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Buggy Bonus vs Leprechaun goes Egypt
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 92.00% against 96.75% — Leprechaun goes Egypt is 4.75 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 500× and 500×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
