Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Habanero

Habanero

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 93.00% against 93.00%.
Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 2,013× against 1,455×, with Dr Feelgood higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: Very high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sir Blingalot returns more in theory over the long run, while Dr Feelgood reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Money Roll does not publish one.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,013× and 2,001×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Money Roll does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)