Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Dr Feelgood
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 93.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 2,013×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Truth
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Sir Blingalot
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 93.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,455×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Dr Feelgood vs Truth
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Truth does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Dr Feelgood vs Sir Blingalot
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 93.00% against 93.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 2,013× against 1,455×, with Dr Feelgood higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Very high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sir Blingalot returns more in theory over the long run, while Dr Feelgood reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
