Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Dragon's Throne
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Wild Pixies
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 700×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Frontier Fortune
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 917×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Dragon's Throne vs Wild Pixies
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.48% — Wild Pixies is 10.48 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 500× against 700×, with Wild Pixies higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Dragon's Throne vs Frontier Fortune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.8×: 500× against 917×, with Frontier Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
