Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Habanero

Booongo

NetEnt

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: 3 Clover Pots Extra does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: 3 Clover Pots Extra does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.44% — Golden Grimoire™ is 10.44 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 560× against 500×, with Fenghuang higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Golden Grimoire™ does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Golden Grimoire™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Fenghuang reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)