Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Four Divine Beasts
Habanero
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,800×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Cashomatic
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.33%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,200×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Four Divine Beasts vs Cashomatic
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 92.00% against 96.33% — Cashomatic is 4.33 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,800× against 2,200×, with Cashomatic higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Cashomatic does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Four Divine Beasts vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
