Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Frontier Fortune

Habanero

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
86.00%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
917×
Reels
5
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →
VS

Lucky Mouse

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.57%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
1,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →
VS

10000 Fortunes

Microgaming

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
Not published
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
Not published
Reels
5
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Frontier Fortune vs Lucky Mouse

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.57% — Lucky Mouse is 10.57 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 917× and 1,000×.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
  • Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Frontier Fortune vs 10000 Fortunes

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Habanero and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: 10000 Fortunes does not publish one.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
  • Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)