Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Happy Ape
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,778×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Jingle Bells Bonanza
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,186×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Demon Pots
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.01%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 6,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Horror, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Happy Ape vs Jingle Bells Bonanza
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Jingle Bells Bonanza does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 5,778× against 4,186×, with Happy Ape higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jingle Bells Bonanza does not publish a rating.
Happy Ape vs Demon Pots
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.01% — Demon Pots is 10.01 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,778× and 6,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
