Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Haunted Harbor
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 72,694×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Vampire's Fate
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 87.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 3,003×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 87.00% — Vampire's Fate is 1.00 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 24.2×: 72,694× against 3,003×, with Haunted Harbor higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Vampire's Fate returns more in theory over the long run, while Haunted Harbor reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
