Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Jellyfish Flow Ultra
Habanero
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 64,841×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
VS
Crabby's Gold
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.25%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 70,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Jellyfish Flow Ultra vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jellyfish Flow Ultra does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Jellyfish Flow Ultra vs Crabby's Gold
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.25% — Crabby's Gold is 10.25 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 64,841× and 70,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jellyfish Flow Ultra does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
