Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Habanero

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Robber Strike does not publish one.
Win caps differ by about 13.0×: 64,841× against 5,000×, with Jellyfish Flow Ultra higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Jellyfish Flow Ultra does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.25% — Crabby's Gold is 10.25 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 64,841× and 70,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Jellyfish Flow Ultra does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)