Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Jump!
Habanero
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 1,440×
- Reels
- 2
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS

3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Jump! vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Jump! vs Gods of Gold: InfiniReels™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.21% — Gods of Gold: InfiniReels™ is 10.21 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 5.1×: 1,440× against 7,300×, with Gods of Gold: InfiniReels™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gods of Gold: InfiniReels™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)





