Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Kane's Inferno
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 240×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Isibaya Queens
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Ultra Burn
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.62%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Kane's Inferno vs Isibaya Queens
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Kane's Inferno vs Ultra Burn
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.62% — Ultra Burn is 10.62 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.1×: 240× against 500×, with Ultra Burn higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
