Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Habanero

NetEnt

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.90% — Fortune Rangers™ is 10.90 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 480× against 700×, with Fortune Rangers™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Fortune Rangers™ does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.51% — Triple Dragons is 10.51 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.7×: 480× against 1,300×, with Triple Dragons higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)