Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Koi Gate
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 480×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Triple Dragons
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,300×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Dragon's Throne
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Koi Gate vs Triple Dragons
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.51% — Triple Dragons is 10.51 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.7×: 480× against 1,300×, with Triple Dragons higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Koi Gate vs Dragon's Throne
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 480× and 500×.
- Volatility labels differ: High against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
