Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Koi Koi Treasure
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 87.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Adventure
VS
10000 Fortunes
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Fate's Fortune
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Koi Koi Treasure vs 10000 Fortunes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 10000 Fortunes does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Koi Koi Treasure vs Fate's Fortune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 87.00% against 96.20% — Fate's Fortune is 9.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
