Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Laughing Buddha
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,002×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Rainbowmania
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,031×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Wild Bandolier
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Laughing Buddha vs Rainbowmania
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,002× and 2,031×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Laughing Buddha vs Wild Bandolier
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.29% — Wild Bandolier is 10.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,002× and 2,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wild Bandolier returns more in theory over the long run, while Laughing Buddha reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
