Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Laughing Buddha
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,002×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Rainbowmania
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,031×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Money Roll
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,001×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Laughing Buddha vs Rainbowmania
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,002× and 2,031×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Laughing Buddha vs Money Roll
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Money Roll does not publish one.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,002× and 2,001×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Money Roll does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
