Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lucky Lucky
Habanero
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 900×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Caishen Wins
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Orbs of Atlantis
Habanero
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,080×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lucky Lucky vs Caishen Wins
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Caishen Wins does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Caishen Wins does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Lucky Lucky vs Orbs of Atlantis
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 900× against 2,080×, with Orbs of Atlantis higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
