Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Magic Oak
Habanero
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,250×
- Reels
- 4
- Theme signals
- Fantasy, Wealth
VS
Poseidon
Habanero
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,094×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Animals, Wealth
VS
Cash 'N Riches Megaways™
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Magic Oak vs Poseidon
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 1,250× against 1,094×, with Magic Oak higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Poseidon returns more in theory over the long run, while Magic Oak reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Magic Oak vs Cash 'N Riches Megaways™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Cash 'N Riches Megaways™ does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
