Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Meow Janken
Habanero
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 87.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,451×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Magic Oak
Habanero
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,250×
- Reels
- 4
- Theme signals
- Fantasy, Wealth
VS
Ultimate Striker
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Meow Janken vs Magic Oak
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 87.00% against 86.00% — Meow Janken is 1.00 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,451× against 1,250×, with Meow Janken higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Meow Janken vs Ultimate Striker
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Ultimate Striker does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Ultimate Striker does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
