Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Mystic Fortune
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 94.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,947×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Space Fortune
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 94.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,145×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Sci-fi & neon
VS
Lucky Dragons
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,100×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Mystic Fortune vs Space Fortune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 94.00% against 94.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 1,947× against 2,145×, with Space Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Mystic Fortune vs Lucky Dragons
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 94.00% against 95.19% — Lucky Dragons is 1.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,947× and 2,100×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
