Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
New Years Bash
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 851×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Lantern Luck
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 703×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Jolly Roger
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 97.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 928×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
New Years Bash vs Lantern Luck
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 851× against 703×, with New Years Bash higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Lantern Luck returns more in theory over the long run, while New Years Bash reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
New Years Bash vs Jolly Roger
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 97.00% — Jolly Roger is 11.00 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 851× and 928×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
