Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Habanero

Habanero

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 550× against 760×, with Super Twister higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.54% — Magic Journey is 10.54 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 550× against 400×, with Nuwa higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Magic Journey returns more in theory over the long run, while Nuwa reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)