Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Nuwa Deluxe
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 852×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Steampunk Plinko
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 3,963×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Stadium of Riches
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.58%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Nuwa Deluxe vs Steampunk Plinko
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 4.7×: 852× against 3,963×, with Steampunk Plinko higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Nuwa Deluxe vs Stadium of Riches
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.58% — Stadium of Riches is 10.58 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 5.9×: 852× against 5,000×, with Stadium of Riches higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Very high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
