Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Habanero

Habanero

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 93.00% against 92.00% — Pamper Me is 1.00 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 751× against 1,000×, with Shaolin Fortunes 100 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Pamper Me returns more in theory over the long run, while Shaolin Fortunes 100 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 93.00% against 97.00% — Jolly Roger is 4.00 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 751× against 928×, with Jolly Roger higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Low.

Add to the comparison (up to four)