Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Pamper Me
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 93.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 751×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Jolly Roger
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 97.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 928×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Devil's 13
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 1,300×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Pamper Me vs Jolly Roger
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 93.00% against 97.00% — Jolly Roger is 4.00 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 751× against 928×, with Jolly Roger higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Pamper Me vs Devil's 13
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Devil's 13 does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 751× against 1,300×, with Devil's 13 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
