Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Panda Panda
Habanero
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 6,075×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
VS
Gold of Fortune God
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.18%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 6,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.18% — Gold of Fortune God is 10.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 6,075× and 6,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Gold of Fortune God returns more in theory over the long run, while Panda Panda reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
