Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Habanero

Play’n GO

Booongo

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.18% — Gold of Fortune God is 10.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 6,075× and 6,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Gold of Fortune God returns more in theory over the long run, while Panda Panda reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Dragon Tribe Nolimit City66%