Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Queen of Queens
Habanero
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,200×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Four Divine Beasts
Habanero
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,800×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Queen of Queens vs Four Divine Beasts
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 92.00% against 92.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 1,200× against 1,800×, with Four Divine Beasts higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Queen of Queens vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
