Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Racing Royalty
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,324×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sports
VS
Wicked Witch
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,329×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Champions of Mithrune
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.25%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy, Sports
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Racing Royalty vs Wicked Witch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,324× and 1,329×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Racing Royalty vs Champions of Mithrune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.25% — Champions of Mithrune is 10.25 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 5.7×: 1,324× against 7,500×, with Champions of Mithrune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Sports.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
