Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Rodeo Drive
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 6,016×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Pirate's Plunder
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 12,556×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Demon Pots
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.01%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 6,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Horror, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Rodeo Drive vs Pirate's Plunder
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 92.00% against 92.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.1×: 6,016× against 12,556×, with Pirate's Plunder higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Rodeo Drive vs Demon Pots
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 92.00% against 96.01% — Demon Pots is 4.01 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 6,016× and 6,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Demon Pots returns more in theory over the long run, while Rodeo Drive reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
