Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Habanero

Habanero

Booongo

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 92.00% against 86.00% — Rolling Roger is 6.00 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 534× and 543×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Rolling Roger returns more in theory over the long run, while Santa's Village reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Coin Tornado does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: Coin Tornado does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)