Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Scruffy Scallywags
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 272×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Buggy Bonus
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Butterfly Staxx 2
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.35%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 300×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Scruffy Scallywags vs Buggy Bonus
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 92.00% against 92.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.8×: 272× against 500×, with Buggy Bonus higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Scruffy Scallywags vs Butterfly Staxx 2
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 92.00% against 96.35% — Butterfly Staxx 2 is 4.35 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 272× against 300×, with Butterfly Staxx 2 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Butterfly Staxx 2 does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
