Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Shamrock Quest
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,249×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Music & party
VS
Treasure Stacks
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
VS
Mystic Rings
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,016×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Shamrock Quest vs Treasure Stacks
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Treasure Stacks does not publish one.
- Volatility labels differ: Very high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Shamrock Quest vs Mystic Rings
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,249× and 10,016×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Mystic Rings returns more in theory over the long run, while Shamrock Quest reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
