Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Shamrock Quest
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,249×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Music & party
VS
Temple of Prosperity
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Yeti Quest
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Shamrock Quest vs Temple of Prosperity
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.20% — Temple of Prosperity is 10.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,249× and 10,000×.
- Volatility labels differ: Very high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Temple of Prosperity returns more in theory over the long run, while Shamrock Quest reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Shamrock Quest vs Yeti Quest
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.06% — Yeti Quest is 10.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,249× against 5,000×, with Shamrock Quest higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Yeti Quest returns more in theory over the long run, while Shamrock Quest reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
