Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Shaolin Fortunes 100
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Divine Fortune
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.59%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Treasure Tomb
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 1,200×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Shaolin Fortunes 100 vs Divine Fortune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 92.00% against 96.59% — Divine Fortune is 4.59 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,000× and 1,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Divine Fortune does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Shaolin Fortunes 100 vs Treasure Tomb
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 92.00% against 92.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,000× against 1,200×, with Treasure Tomb higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
