Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Shivering Strings
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,877×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Gangsters
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 3,204×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Sweet Jar Xmas Combo
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Shivering Strings vs Gangsters
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 2,877× against 3,204×, with Gangsters higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Shivering Strings vs Sweet Jar Xmas Combo
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Sweet Jar Xmas Combo does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
