Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Siren's Spell
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 3,352×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Druid’s Magic
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.14%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,983×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.14% — Druid’s Magic is 10.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 3,352× against 2,983×, with Siren's Spell higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Druid’s Magic does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Druid’s Magic returns more in theory over the long run, while Siren's Spell reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
