Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sparta
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 2,270×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Dragon Castle
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 2,168×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Jingle Bells Bonanza
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,186×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Sparta vs Dragon Castle
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,270× and 2,168×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Dragon Castle returns more in theory over the long run, while Sparta reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Sparta vs Jingle Bells Bonanza
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Jingle Bells Bonanza does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.8×: 2,270× against 4,186×, with Jingle Bells Bonanza higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jingle Bells Bonanza does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
