Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Habanero

NetEnt

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Jingle Bells Bonanza does not publish one.
Win caps differ by about 1.8×: 2,270× against 4,186×, with Jingle Bells Bonanza higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Jingle Bells Bonanza does not publish a rating.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.20% — Piranha Pays is 10.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.2×: 2,270× against 5,000×, with Piranha Pays higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.

Add to the comparison (up to four)