Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
The Dead Escape
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 322×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Frankenstein
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Jugglenaut
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 562×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
The Dead Escape vs Frankenstein
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 86.00% against 96.19% — Frankenstein is 10.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
The Dead Escape vs Jugglenaut
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 322× against 562×, with Jugglenaut higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
