Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Treasure Diver
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,302×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Treasure Stacks Wilds
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
VS
Pirates Pub
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Treasure Diver vs Treasure Stacks Wilds
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Treasure Stacks Wilds does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Treasure Diver vs Pirates Pub
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 92.00% against 96.03% — Pirates Pub is 4.03 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.8×: 1,302× against 5,000×, with Pirates Pub higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
